GeForce RTX 4090 vs GTX 460M SLI

Place in the ranking	633	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	6
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.82
Power efficiency	no data	15.23
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	N11E-GS	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 September 2010 (14 years ago)	20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	16384
Core clock speed	675 MHz	2235 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	450 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	1,290
Floating-point processing power	no data	82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	176
TMUs	no data	512
Tensor Cores	no data	512
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	2x1536 MB	24 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	1.01 TB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460M SLI 4.98

RTX 4090 100.00
+1908%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 460M SLI 3313

RTX 4090 104598
+3057%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 460M SLI 14236

RTX 4090 137609
+867%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	52 −1823%	1000−1050 +1823%
Full HD	65 −298%	259 +298%
1440p	9−10 −2122%	200 +2122%
4K	7−8 −1943%	143 +1943%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	6.17
1440p	no data	8.00
4K	no data	11.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

−2713%

225
+2713%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1708%	235 +1708%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −5640%	287 +5640%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −1777%	240−250 +1777%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −991%	120−130 +991%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −2675%	222 +2675%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −973%	110−120 +973%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −1336%	200−210 +1336%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −839%	290−300 +839%
Hitman 3	10−12 −1073%	120−130 +1073%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −1000%	350−400 +1000%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −1192%	150−160 +1192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −854%	120−130 +854%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −2467%	450−500 +2467%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −235%	150−160 +235%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1462%	200−210 +1462%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −4860%	248 +4860%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −1777%	240−250 +1777%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −991%	120−130 +991%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −2575%	214 +2575%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −973%	110−120 +973%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −1336%	200−210 +1336%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −839%	290−300 +839%
Hitman 3	10−12 −1073%	120−130 +1073%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −1000%	350−400 +1000%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −1192%	150−160 +1192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −854%	120−130 +854%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −2944%	548 +2944%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −1239%	240−250 +1239%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −235%	150−160 +235%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1277%	179 +1277%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −4300%	220 +4300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −991%	120−130 +991%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −2525%	210 +2525%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −973%	110−120 +973%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −839%	290−300 +839%
Hitman 3	10−12 −1073%	120−130 +1073%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −1131%	394 +1131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −2906%	541 +2906%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −1594%	305 +1594%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −233%	153 +233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−854%

120−130
+854%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −1744%	160−170 +1744%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −1300%	110−120 +1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3000%	155 +3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1950%	80−85 +1950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7600%	154 +7600%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1300%	80−85 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −2364%	270−280 +2364%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1433%	130−140 +1433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −3427%	388 +3427%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −7500%	152 +7500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −6600%	268 +6600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −674%	240−250 +674%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−1333%

120−130
+1333%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2100%	85−90 +2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2200%	65−70 +2200%
Hitman 3	1−2 −8200%	80−85 +8200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1400%	105 +1400%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −7000%	140−150 +7000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −28000%	281 +28000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3900%	120 +3900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −5900%	120 +5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2500%	50−55 +2500%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	80
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −6300%	250−260 +6300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −11600%	117 +11600%