Quadro4 380 XGL vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 OEM with Quadro4 380 XGL, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 OEM
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
3.01
+14950%

GTX 460 OEM outperforms Quadro4 380 XGL by a whopping 14950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7751497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.40no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGF104NV18 A4
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)12 November 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336no data
Core clock speed650 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate36.401.100
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz256 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s8.192 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.01 0.02
Recency 11 October 2010 12 November 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GTX 460 OEM has a 14950% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 380 XGL in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop card while Quadro4 380 XGL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL
Quadro4 380 XGL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 282 votes

Rate Quadro4 380 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.