Quadro P500 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB with Quadro P500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 768MB
4.23
+2.9%

GTX 460 768MB outperforms P500 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking683692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.26
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP108
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data5 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336256
Core clock speed675 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1518 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.29
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7772 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 768MB 4.23
+2.9%
Quadro P500 4.11

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 460 768MB 2811
Quadro P500 3022
+7.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 460 768MB 2092
Quadro P500 2255
+7.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 460 768MB 17589
+36.7%
Quadro P500 12868

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+132%
19
−132%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Dota 2 10
−60%
16
+60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
World of Tanks 70−75
+2.8%
70−75
−2.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Dota 2 12−14
−246%
45
+246%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Valorant 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
World of Tanks 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and Quadro P500 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is 132% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 460 768MB is 100% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P500 is 246% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is ahead in 26 tests (43%)
  • Quadro P500 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.23 4.11

GTX 460 768MB has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro P500.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop card while Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
NVIDIA Quadro P500
Quadro P500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 97 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 30 votes

Rate Quadro P500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 768MB or Quadro P500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.