Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	671	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code name	no data	Crestline
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	336	8
Core clock speed	675 MHz	500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	no data	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	13.5 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	no data
Shared memory	-	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

11

10

Pros & cons summary

---

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---