C67 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	669	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	no data	C67
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	no data	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	336	no data
Core clock speed	675 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	112 million
Manufacturing process technology	no data	90 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

PureVideo HD

no data

VP1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	no data	3.0
OpenGL	no data	2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---