ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 260 GTX 260 Core 216 GTX 260 OEM GTX 275 GTX 280 GTX 285 GTX 295 GTX 295 Single PCB GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti GTX 960 GTX 970
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Mobility Radeon HD 5145 Mobility Radeon HD 5430 Mobility Radeon HD 5450 Mobility Radeon HD 5470 Mobility Radeon HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5750 Mobility Radeon HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 295 with Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire, including specs and performance data.

GTX 295
2009
1792 MB GDDR3, 289 Watt
3.13
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire
2010
2x1 GB DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5, 120 Watt
4.80
+53.4%

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire outperforms GTX 295 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 295 GTX 295
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking753639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Power efficiency0.762.79
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT200BBroadway-XT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4801600
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate46.08no data
Floating-point processing power0.5962 TFLOPSno data
ROPs28no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB2x1 GB
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/sno data
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30−35
−76.7%
53
+76.7%
Full HD35−40
−54.3%
54
+54.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 295 and ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 77% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 54% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 68 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.13 4.80
Recency 8 January 2009 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 120 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire has a 53.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 140.8% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 295 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 295 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
vs
GeForce 945A GeForce 945A
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
GTX 260 GeForce GTX 260
6600 GT GeForce 6600 GT
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Iris Plus Graphics G4
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
vs
Zhongshan Subor Zhongshan Subor
RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2270 1GB Edition FirePro 2270 1GB Edition
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
ATI HD 4720 Radeon HD 4720
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
vs
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
vs
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
GTX 770M GeForce GTX 770M
vs
Quadro 4000M Quadro 4000M
ATI M97 M97
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 80 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.