Radeon RX Vega 20 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	682	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.91	no data
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	no data
GPU code name	N10E-GTX	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	no data
Core clock speed	576 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1508 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

large

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1020 MHz	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	no data
CUDA	+	-

Pros & cons summary

---

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---