ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking682not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXCedar
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25680
Core clock speed576 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million292 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.000
Floating-point performanceno data0.08 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 17 Watt

ATI 2460 Multi-View has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 782.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and FirePro 2460 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook card while FirePro 2460 Multi-View is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
FirePro 2460 Multi-View

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.