Arc 3 A370M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking682not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.91no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed576 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data99.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 3 A370M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook card while Arc 3 A370M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Intel Arc 3 A370M
Arc 3 A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 12 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.