PG506-242 vs GeForce GTX 285

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking696not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Power efficiency1.34no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT200BGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 December 2008 (15 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2403584
Core clock speed648 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt165 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate51.84322.6
Floating-point processing power0.7085 TFLOPS10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80224
Tensor Coresno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin8-pin EPS
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed1242 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth159.0 GB/s933.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 December 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 165 Watt

PG506-242 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 23.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285 and PG506-242. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285 is a desktop card while PG506-242 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285
NVIDIA PG506-242
PG506-242

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 110 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-242 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.