Quadro Plex 7000 vs GeForce GTX 280M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking978not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.39no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG92GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2009 (15 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$14,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128512
Core clock speed585 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors754 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate37.4436.74
Floating-point processing power0.3745 TFLOPS1.176 TFLOPS
Gigaflops562no data
ROPs1648
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IVPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 950 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA4x DVI, 2x S-Video
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 600 Watt

GTX 280M has 700% lower power consumption.

Plex 7000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M and Quadro Plex 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M is a notebook card while Quadro Plex 7000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 280M
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
Quadro Plex 7000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 21 vote

Rate Quadro Plex 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.