GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GTX 280M

Place in the ranking	976	89
Place by popularity	not in top-100	19
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	47.47
Power efficiency	1.38	17.06
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G92	TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 March 2009 (15 years ago)	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	2176
Core clock speed	585 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	37.44	224.4
Floating-point processing power	0.3745 TFLOPS	7.181 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	562	no data
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	64	136
Tensor Cores	no data	272
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-IV	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 950 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	61 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	8.0	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 280M 1.49

RTX 2060 Super 42.84
+2775%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 280M 575

RTX 2060 Super 16527
+2774%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 280M 6672

RTX 2060 Super 83631
+1153%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −2900%	120 +2900%
1440p	2−3 −3250%	67 +3250%
4K	1−2 −4300%	44 +4300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.33
1440p	no data	5.96
4K	no data	9.07

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−2100%

88
+2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1583%	101 +1583%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2450%	102 +2450%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1875%	79 +1875%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −6400%	130 +6400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −3500%	144 +3500%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −7375%	299 +7375%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1467%	94 +1467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1887%	298 +1887%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3967%	122 +3967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2463%	205 +2463%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −594%	229 +594%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −2350%	147 +2350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2275%	95 +2275%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1675%	71 +1675%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5300%	108 +5300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −2550%	106 +2550%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −6675%	271 +6675%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1533%	98 +1533%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1853%	293 +1853%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3067%	95 +3067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2200%	184 +2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −700%	85−90 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −555%	216 +555%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −917%	61 +917%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1675%	71 +1675%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1450%	62 +1450%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3600%	74 +3600%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2900%	120 +2900%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1300%	84 +1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −773%	131 +773%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1850%	156 +1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −673%	85 +673%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −78.8%	59 +78.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−3700%

114
+3700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −4700%	96 +4700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −3600%	74 +3600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	53
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3900%	40 +3900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2750%	57 +2750%
Hitman 3	7−8 −729%	58 +729%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1880%	99 +1880%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −2929%	212 +2929%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1950%

82
+1950%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−4000%

41
+4000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3400%	35 +3400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2800%	29 +2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	30
Far Cry 5	0−1	30

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1300%

42
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	81 +0%	81 +0%
Battlefield 5	163 +0%	163 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	68 +0%	68 +0%
Battlefield 5	150 +0%	150 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +0%	47 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	259 +0%	259 +0%
Metro Exodus	87 +0%	87 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	114 +0%	114 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	47 +0%	47 +0%
Hitman 3	39 +0%	39 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	105 +0%	105 +0%
Metro Exodus	64 +0%	64 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 +0%	59 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	19 +0%	19 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	67 +0%	67 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65 +0%	65 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 +0%	25 +0%

This is how GTX 280M and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is 2900% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Super is 3250% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Super is 4300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 7375% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.49	42.84
Recency	3 March 2009	9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	175 Watt

GTX 280M has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Super, on the other hand, has a 2775.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.