Quadro K5000 SYNC vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking721not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.64no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)25 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561536
Core clock speed585 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rateno data90.37
Floating-point processing powerno data2.169 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data172.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x SDI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 25 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 122 Watt

K5000 SYNC has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 23% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Quadro K5000 SYNC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook card while Quadro K5000 SYNC is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
Quadro K5000 SYNC

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 25 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 SYNC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.