GeForce RTX 3070 vs GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 280M SLI with GeForce RTX 3070, including specs and performance data.

GTX 280M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.44

RTX 3070 outperforms GTX 280M SLI by a whopping 1585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72138
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.50
Power efficiency1.6519.01
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2565888
Core clock speed585 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rateno data317.4
Floating-point processing powerno data20.31 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 280M SLI 3.44
RTX 3070 57.98
+1585%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 280M SLI 9435
RTX 3070 88744
+841%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−1750%
148
+1750%
1440p5−6
−1920%
101
+1920%
4K3−4
−2033%
64
+2033%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2350%
147
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1150%
125
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−4900%
100
+4900%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−2967%
180−190
+2967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1263%
100−110
+1263%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2217%
139
+2217%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1079%
220−230
+1079%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1263%
109
+1263%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2780%
144
+2780%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1375%
118
+1375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1692%
230−240
+1692%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−335%
174
+335%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−4250%
87
+4250%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−2967%
180−190
+2967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1263%
100−110
+1263%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2000%
126
+2000%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1079%
220−230
+1079%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1350%
116
+1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2780%
144
+2780%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1325%
110−120
+1325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1862%
255
+1862%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−707%
120−130
+707%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−345%
178
+345%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−710%
81
+710%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1263%
100−110
+1263%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1600%
102
+1600%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1079%
220−230
+1079%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1288%
111
+1288%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−654%
181
+654%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1615%
223
+1615%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−707%
121
+707%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−113%
85
+113%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1350%
116
+1350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1983%
120−130
+1983%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2167%
68
+2167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3350%
65−70
+3350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1600%
65−70
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 270−280
Hitman 3 8−9
−1100%
96
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1725%
146
+1725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−775%
175
+775%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1529%
114
+1529%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2300%
48
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 30
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−8800%
85−90
+8800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1625%
69
+1625%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 101
+0%
101
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
+0%
166
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 52
+0%
52
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+0%
97
+0%

This is how GTX 280M SLI and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 1750% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 1920% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 2033% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 is 8800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is ahead in 62 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.44 57.98
Recency 2 March 2009 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 220 Watt

GTX 280M SLI has 46.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has a 1585.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10850 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.