ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830 vs GeForce GTX 275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 OEM GTX 260 Rev. 2 GTX 275 GTX 275 PhysX Edition GTX 285 GTX 285 Mac Edition GTX 285 X2 GTX 295 GTX 295 Single PCB
VS
Radeon HD 6970M Rebrand Radeon HD 6990M Rebrand Mobility Radeon HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 5870

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 275 with Mobility Radeon HD 5830, including specs and performance data.

GTX 275
2009
896 MB GDDR3, 219 Watt
3.60
+161%

GTX 275 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5830 by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 275 GTX 275
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility HD 5830

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7301024
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Power efficiency1.133.94
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT200BBroadway
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 January 2009 (16 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240800
Core clock speed633 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt24 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.6420.00
Floating-point processing power0.6739 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs2816
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB1 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.04.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.60 1.38
Recency 15 January 2009 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 24 Watt

GTX 275 has a 160.9% higher aggregate performance score.

ATI Mobility HD 5830, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 812.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5830 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 5830 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830
Mobility Radeon HD 5830
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5830
vs
GT 630M GeForce GT 630M
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
GTX 765M 765M
vs
GTX 465 465
GTX 765M SLI 765M SLI
vs
GTX 465 465
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
GT 220 OEM GT 220 OEM
Sony Playstation 2 GPU 65nm
vs
G210 OEM G210 OEM
RTX 3050 6 GB RTX 3050 6 GB
vs
G100 OEM G100 OEM
NVS 295 NVS 295
vs
GTX 285 GTX 285
Millennium G200
vs
7600 GT 7600 GT
RTX A6000 RTX A6000
vs
7300 GS Low Profile 7300 GS Low Profile
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
vs
6200 LE 6200 LE
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
6200 LE 6200 LE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 139 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 or Mobility Radeon HD 5830, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.