GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GTX 275

Place in performance ranking	716	270
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.34	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GT200B	N18P-G62
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	15 January 2009 (15 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	1024
CUDA cores	240	no data
Core clock speed	633 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	50.64	95.04
Floating-point performance	0.6739 gflops	3.041 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1134 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	127.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.0	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 275 3.65

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21
+454%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 275 1408

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+454%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −480%	58 +480%
1440p	7−8 −514%	43 +514%
4K	4−5 −500%	24 +500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 +0%	61 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +0%	49 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +0%	53 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +0%	46 +0%
Far Cry 5	69 +0%	69 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +0%	84 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Hitman 3	51 +0%	51 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	181 +0%	181 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	201 +0%	201 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 +0%	32 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +0%	47 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +0%	36 +0%
Far Cry 5	58 +0%	58 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 +0%	59 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Hitman 3	50 +0%	50 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180 +0%	180 +0%
Metro Exodus	79 +0%	79 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +0%	39 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75 +0%	75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	183 +0%	183 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +0%	27 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 +0%	15 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 +0%	31 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +0%	34 +0%
Far Cry 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Hitman 3	43 +0%	43 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	64 +0%	64 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +0%	63 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +0%	39 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 +0%	22 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +0%	38 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +0%	16 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Hitman 3	28 +0%	28 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120 +0%	120 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 +0%	20 +0%
Hitman 3	16 +0%	16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 +0%	42 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +0%	25 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+0%

18−20

+0%

This is how GTX 275 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 480% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 514% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.65	20.21
Recency	15 January 2009	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 453.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 357.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 338% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 275 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.