ATI FireGL V7300 vs GeForce GTX 275

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking716not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.33no data
Power efficiency1.14no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGT200BR520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240no data
Core clock speed633 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt97 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.649.504
Floating-point processing power0.6739 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2816
TMUs8016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB512 MB
Memory bus width448 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz648 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s41.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.02.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2009 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 97 Watt

GTX 275 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7300, on the other hand, has 125.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 275 and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 is a desktop card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
ATI FireGL V7300
FireGL V7300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 137 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.