GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs GTX 260M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking737not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.52no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXGF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)11 July 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224144
Core clock speed550 MHz783 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.79
Floating-point processing powerno data0.451 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 11 July 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 106 Watt

GTX 260M SLI has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTS 450 Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 41.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.