Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce GTX 260

Place in the ranking	747	149
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.14	no data
Power efficiency	1.20	19.86
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GT200	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	16 June 2008 (16 years ago)	4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2048
Core clock speed	576 MHz	1280 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2469 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	182 Watt	120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	36.86	316.0
Floating-point processing power	0.4769 TFLOPS	20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs	28	64
TMUs	64	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	111.9 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVIHDTV	Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 260 3.15

RX 7600M XT 34.43
+993%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 260 1215

RX 7600M XT 13282
+993%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −1100%	120 +1100%
1440p	5−6 −1080%	59 +1080%
4K	3−4 −1067%	35 +1067%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	44.90	no data
1440p	89.80	no data
4K	149.67	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

+0%

50−55

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	131 +0%	131 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	139 +0%	139 +0%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Hitman 3	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	237 +0%	237 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	114 +0%	114 +0%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Hitman 3	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	142 +0%	142 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	208 +0%	208 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85 +0%	85 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 +0%	92 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180 +0%	180 +0%
Hitman 3	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140 +0%	140 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180 +0%	180 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100 +0%	100 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60 +0%	60 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80

+0%

75−80

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +0%	62 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	67 +0%	67 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	106 +0%	106 +0%
Metro Exodus	92 +0%	92 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120 +0%	120 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +0%	74 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

+0%

50−55

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Hitman 3	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	99 +0%	99 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 +0%	52 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	32 +0%	32 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30 +0%	30 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	90 +0%	90 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	64 +0%	64 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 +0%	22 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

This is how GTX 260 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600M XT is 1100% faster in 1080p
RX 7600M XT is 1080% faster in 1440p
RX 7600M XT is 1067% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.15	34.43
Recency	16 June 2008	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	182 Watt	120 Watt

RX 7600M XT has a 993% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 51.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.