Quadro 6000 SDI vs GeForce GTX 260

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking747not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Power efficiency1.20no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGT200GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 June 2008 (16 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $11,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448
Core clock speed576 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Watt231 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate36.8632.14
Floating-point processing power0.4769 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs2848
TMUs6456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm248 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount896 MB6 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIHDTV2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 182 Watt 231 Watt

GTX 260 has 26.9% lower power consumption.

6000 SDI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 585.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro 6000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 is a desktop card while Quadro 6000 SDI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 260
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
Quadro 6000 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 599 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.