Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 260 216

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT200TU102
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date16 September 2008 (16 years ago)4 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2164608
Core clock speed576 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate41.47419.0
Floating-point processing power0.5365 TFLOPS13.41 TFLOPS
ROPs2896
TMUs72288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount896 MB24 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.37.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 September 2008 4 September 2019
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 182 Watt 200 Watt

GTX 260 216 has 9.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 2642.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.