H100 SXM5 vs GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2

GTX 260 GTX 260 Core 216 GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 OEM GTX 260 Rev. 2 GTX 275 GTX 280 GTX 285 GTX 295 GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti GTX 960
VS
H100 CNX H100 PCIe H100 PCIe 80 GB H100 PCIe 96 GB H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5 64 GB H100 SXM5 80 GB H100 SXM5 96 GB H800 PCIe 80 GB H800 SXM5

Contents

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 216 Rev. 2
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGT200BGH100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 November 2008 (15 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2168448
Core clock speed576 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1780 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate41.47939.8
Floating-point processing power0.5365 TFLOPS30.07 TFLOPS
ROPs2824
TMUs72528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB80 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s1,920 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.39.0

Pros & cons summary

Recency 27 November 2008 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 700 Watt

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 has 309.4% lower power consumption.

H100 SXM5, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 9042.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and H100 SXM5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while H100 SXM5 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA H100 SXM5
H100 SXM5
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
R3 Graphics Radeon R3 Graphics
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5
vs
ATI FireGL X1-256 FireGL X1 256
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
Xbox Series X 6nm GPU Xbox Series X 6nm GPU
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
GT 130 Mac Edition GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
B200 SXM 192 GB B200 SXM 192 GB
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
9600 GSO 512 GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
R2 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.8 11 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 27 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.