GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs GTX 1660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660
2019
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
30.28

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms GTX 1660 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1865
Place by popularity3961
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.1738.29
Power efficiency17.3019.05
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU116AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 March 2019 (5 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 has 26% better value for money than RTX 4080 SUPER.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140810240
Core clock speed1530 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate157.1816.0
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs48112
TMUs88320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2001 MHz1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.1 GB/s736.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 30.28
RTX 4080 SUPER 88.93
+194%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 11669
RTX 4080 SUPER 34269
+194%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 21064
RTX 4080 SUPER 87055
+313%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 71229
RTX 4080 SUPER 141652
+98.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 14164
RTX 4080 SUPER 59075
+317%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 81755
RTX 4080 SUPER 187847
+130%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 570753
RTX 4080 SUPER 870270
+52.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1660 120
RTX 4080 SUPER 318
+165%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1660 49
RTX 4080 SUPER 124
+151%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1660 9
RTX 4080 SUPER 25
+186%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1660 60
RTX 4080 SUPER 237
+298%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1660 40
RTX 4080 SUPER 121
+200%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1660 63
RTX 4080 SUPER 316
+400%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1660 6
RTX 4080 SUPER 61
+943%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

GTX 1660 134
RTX 4080 SUPER 490
+266%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD83
−214%
261
+214%
1440p49
−269%
181
+269%
4K26
−350%
117
+350%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.643.83
1440p4.475.52
4K8.428.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 71
−182%
200−210
+182%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−262%
235
+262%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
−376%
281
+376%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−146%
240−250
+146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 73
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
−193%
170−180
+193%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−73.5%
110−120
+73.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−161%
200−210
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−60%
260−270
+60%
Hitman 3 69
−87%
120−130
+87%
Horizon Zero Dawn 306
−2%
300−350
+2%
Metro Exodus 144
−7.6%
150−160
+7.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 112
−10.7%
120−130
+10.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
−278%
350−400
+278%
Watch Dogs: Legion 227
+47.4%
150−160
−47.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 123
−178%
342
+178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
−464%
237
+464%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−146%
240−250
+146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 67
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−177%
130−140
+177%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−73.5%
110−120
+73.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−161%
200−210
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−60%
260−270
+60%
Hitman 3 67
−92.5%
120−130
+92.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 287
−8.7%
300−350
+8.7%
Metro Exodus 113
−37.2%
150−160
+37.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 79
−57%
120−130
+57%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
−416%
568
+416%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−217%
200−210
+217%
Watch Dogs: Legion 214
+39%
150−160
−39%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−143%
158
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
−465%
209
+465%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 49
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−175%
110−120
+175%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−73.5%
110−120
+73.5%
Forza Horizon 4 98
−229%
322
+229%
Hitman 3 59
−119%
120−130
+119%
Horizon Zero Dawn 93
−357%
425
+357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
−455%
527
+455%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
−361%
263
+361%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
−400%
145
+400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
−53.1%
120−130
+53.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−191%
160−170
+191%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−143%
110−120
+143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−322%
135
+322%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−511%
165
+511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
−141%
80−85
+141%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−140%
80−85
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−55.7%
270−280
+55.7%
Hitman 3 39
−231%
120−130
+231%
Horizon Zero Dawn 67
−415%
345
+415%
Metro Exodus 59
−190%
171
+190%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
−493%
397
+493%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−453%
221
+453%
Watch Dogs: Legion 187
−28.3%
240−250
+28.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 53
−143%
120−130
+143%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−193%
85−90
+193%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−188%
65−70
+188%
Hitman 3 21
−295%
80−85
+295%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
−34.9%
85
+34.9%
Metro Exodus 44
−223%
140−150
+223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−483%
204
+483%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−405%
96
+405%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−560%
99
+560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
−206%
50−55
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−510%
305
+510%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
−458%
201
+458%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−575%
81
+575%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 26
−327%
110−120
+327%

This is how GTX 1660 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 214% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 269% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 is 47% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 575% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is ahead in 64 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.28 88.93
Recency 14 March 2019 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 320 Watt

GTX 1660 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 193.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5335 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1995 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.