ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157not rated
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.02no data
Power efficiency19.40no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameTU116RV610
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)19 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153640
Core clock speed1500 MHz398 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate169.91.592
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.03184 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs964

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz495 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s7.92 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12915
+10663%
ATI HD 2400 120

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2019 19 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2400, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon HD 2400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
ATI Radeon HD 2400
Radeon HD 2400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7551 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.