A800 PCIe 80 GB vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157not rated
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.92no data
Power efficiency19.32no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)8 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15366912
Core clock speed1500 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate169.9609.1
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs48160
TMUs96432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB80 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1512 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1,935 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.58.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2019 8 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has 108.3% lower power consumption.

A800 PCIe 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and A800 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while A800 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
A800 PCIe 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7569 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate A800 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.