Xbox One GPU vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency25.06no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Durango
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)22 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speed1455 MHz853 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate152.640.94
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS1.31 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs9648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s68.22 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 95 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 18.8% lower power consumption.

Xbox One GPU, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Xbox One GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
AMD Xbox One GPU
Xbox One GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1544 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 86 votes

Rate Xbox One GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.