Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency25.06no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU116G84
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)27 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153632
Core clock speed1455 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt42 Watt
Texture fill rate152.68.320
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS0.06656 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs9616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s20.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.51.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 27 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 42 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

FX 1700 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 90.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1544 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.