ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameTU116BRC410
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2019 (5 years ago)17 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15366
Core clock speed1455 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate152.60.6
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs962

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2019 17 October 2007
Chip lithography 12 nm 130 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh and Radeon Xpress 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh is a notebook card while Radeon Xpress 1100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
Radeon Xpress 1100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 47 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.