Radeon 760M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Place in the ranking	248	356
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	69.15	no data
Power efficiency	26.31	68.01
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU116	Hawx Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	512
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz	2599 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	128.2	83.17
Floating-point processing power	4.101 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	96	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.93
+54.7%

Radeon 760M 14.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+54.7%

Radeon 760M 5696

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 17439
+81.6%

Radeon 760M 9603

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 31845

Radeon 760M 32985
+3.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 13355
+117%

Radeon 760M 6142

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 63086
+51%

Radeon 760M 41767

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 5085
+140%

Radeon 760M 2116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	78 +152%	31 −152%
1440p	27−30 +42.1%	19 −42.1%
4K	34 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.94	no data
1440p	8.48	no data
4K	6.74	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +68%	25 −68%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +53.3%	30 −53.3%
Elden Ring	70−75 +64.4%	45−50 −64.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +47.9%	45−50 −47.9%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +121%	19 −121%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +283%	12 −283%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +94.1%	51 −94.1%
Metro Exodus	81 +97.6%	40−45 −97.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	92 +156%	35−40 −156%
Valorant	102 +72.9%	55−60 −72.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85 +77.1%	45−50 −77.1%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +133%	18 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +411%	9 −411%
Dota 2	89 +287%	23 −287%
Elden Ring	70−75 +64.4%	45−50 −64.4%
Far Cry 5	62 +114%	29 −114%
Fortnite	110−120 +41%	80−85 −41%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +125%	44 −125%
Grand Theft Auto V	87 +156%	34 −156%
Metro Exodus	57 +39%	40−45 −39%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	172 +60.7%	100−110 −60.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 +5.6%	35−40 −5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +62.2%	45−50 −62.2%
Valorant	63 +6.8%	55−60 −6.8%
World of Tanks	240−250 +29.2%	190−200 −29.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +47.9%	45−50 −47.9%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +61.5%	24−27 −61.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +58.6%	27−30 −58.6%
Dota 2	86 +62.3%	50−55 −62.3%
Far Cry 5	117 +113%	55−60 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +168%	37 −168%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 +38.3%	100−110 −38.3%
Valorant	93 +57.6%	55−60 −57.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%
Elden Ring	35−40 +69.6%	21−24 −69.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +72.7%	21−24 −72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +32.8%	130−140 −32.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
World of Tanks	150−160 +47.1%	100−110 −47.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +80.6%	35−40 −80.6%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +62.5%	30−35 −62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +73.7%	18−20 −73.7%
Valorant	60−65 +64.9%	35−40 −64.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Dota 2	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
Elden Ring	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 +56.8%	40−45 −56.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Dota 2	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Fortnite	27−30 +64.7%	16−18 −64.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Valorant	27−30 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%