GeForce GTX 1650 vs GTX 1660 Super

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.08
+61.9%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms GTX 1650 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162269
Place by popularity83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.5238.84
Power efficiency18.1418.67
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU116TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 October 2019 (5 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Super has 51% better value for money than GTX 1650.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408896
Core clock speed1530 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate157.193.24
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs8856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++
HDCP+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.08
+61.9%
GTX 1650 20.43

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Super 12747
+61.9%
GTX 1650 7874

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Super 21981
+61.1%
GTX 1650 13645

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Super 76654
+71.5%
GTX 1650 44694

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Super 15995
+73.8%
GTX 1650 9203

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Super 95473
+88.9%
GTX 1650 50549

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Super 62616
+59.9%
GTX 1650 39171

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Super 477037
+27.8%
GTX 1650 373333

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Super 60337
+68.5%
GTX 1650 35813

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1660 Super 65044
+62.9%
GTX 1650 39941

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1660 Super 134
+46.6%
GTX 1650 91

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1660 Super 57
+24.4%
GTX 1650 45

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1660 Super 9
+34.4%
GTX 1650 6

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1660 Super 63
+44.5%
GTX 1650 44

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1660 Super 41
+16.4%
GTX 1650 35

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1660 Super 31
+45.8%
GTX 1650 21

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1660 Super 83
+61.7%
GTX 1650 51

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1660 Super 8
+74.5%
GTX 1650 5

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1660 Super 128
+42.6%
GTX 1650 90

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

GTX 1660 Super 154
+44.3%
GTX 1650 106

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

GTX 1660 Super 154
+41.7%
GTX 1650 108

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
+30.4%
69
−30.4%
1440p54
+38.5%
39
−38.5%
4K29
+31.8%
22
−31.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.542.16
1440p4.243.82
4K7.906.77

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 76
+138%
30−35
−138%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88
+66%
53
−66%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+40.4%
47
−40.4%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+35.4%
79
−35.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80
+53.8%
52
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+96.9%
30−35
−96.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+15.6%
64
−15.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 121
+51.3%
80
−51.3%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−30.9%
229
+30.9%
Hitman 3 77
+57.1%
49
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 321
+9.9%
292
−9.9%
Metro Exodus 144
+42.6%
101
−42.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+3.9%
77
−3.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+1.7%
115
−1.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 217
−3.2%
224
+3.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 135
+62.7%
83
−62.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+37.1%
35
−37.1%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+48.6%
72
−48.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 72
+56.5%
46
−56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+62.5%
30−35
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+42.3%
52
−42.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+53.6%
56
−53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−14.9%
201
+14.9%
Hitman 3 75
+59.6%
47
−59.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290
+11.5%
260
−11.5%
Metro Exodus 118
+66.2%
71
−66.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 89
+61.8%
55
−61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+74.3%
74
−74.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+50%
45−50
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 208
+1%
206
−1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+104%
25
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
+238%
13
−238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+588%
8
−588%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+53.1%
30−35
−53.1%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+89.7%
39
−89.7%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+64.6%
65
−64.6%
Hitman 3 65
+58.5%
41
−58.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 99
+65%
60
−65%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 112
+80.6%
62
−80.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+45.2%
42
−45.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 31
+47.6%
21
−47.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 57
+5.6%
54
−5.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+50%
42
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
+58.3%
36
−58.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+122%
18
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 34
+162%
13
−162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+65.2%
21−24
−65.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+117%
12−14
−117%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+58.3%
24
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+55.7%
122
−55.7%
Hitman 3 43
+59.3%
27
−59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 71
+65.1%
43
−65.1%
Metro Exodus 67
+63.4%
41
−63.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+77.8%
45
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 196
+35.2%
145
−35.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+60%
35
−60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+65%
20
−65%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+82.4%
17
−82.4%
Hitman 3 25
+92.3%
13
−92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 66
+61%
41
−61%
Metro Exodus 44
+63%
27
−63%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+53.8%
26
−53.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+84.6%
13
−84.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+260%
5
−260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+58.3%
12
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+80%
30
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
+69.2%
26
−69.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+50%
8
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+64.7%
17
−64.7%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 30% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 38% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 32% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 Super is 588% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 31% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.08 20.43
Recency 29 October 2019 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has a 61.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 20250 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 23772 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.