STG-2000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking266not rated
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.31no data
Power efficiency18.97no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU117NV1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1485 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate93.240.08
Floating-point processing power2.984 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs561

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5FPM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s400.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)1.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 2 Watt

GTX 1650 has an age advantage of 23 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 3650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23407 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 65 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.