Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking300not rated
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Power efficiency25.32no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 April 2020 (4 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243584
Core clock speed1380 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate99.84291.4
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPS9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s409.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.1.125
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 1 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3306 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.