ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Place in the ranking	305	1305
Place by popularity	51	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.49	3.40
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	TU117	Park
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 April 2020 (4 years ago)	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	80
Core clock speed	1380 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,700 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.84	4.000
Floating-point processing power	3.195 TFLOPS	0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	64	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.140	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 17.67
+5255%

ATI Mobility HD 5430 0.33

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Mobile 31311
+3155%

ATI Mobility HD 5430 962

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	59 +5800%	1−2 −5800%
1440p	36	0−1
4K	23	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	38 +533%	6−7 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 +1633%	3−4 −1633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	66 +6500%	1−2 −6500%
Counter-Strike 2	32 +433%	6−7 −433%
Cyberpunk 2077	35 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +1217%	6−7 −1217%
Forza Horizon 5	60 +5900%	1−2 −5900%
Metro Exodus	55 +5400%	1−2 −5400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 +1675%	4−5 −1675%
Valorant	83 +8200%	1−2 −8200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	72 +7100%	1−2 −7100%
Counter-Strike 2	27 +350%	6−7 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +833%	3−4 −833%
Dota 2	72 +7100%	1−2 −7100%
Far Cry 5	62 +786%	7−8 −786%
Fortnite	95−100 +9800%	1−2 −9800%
Forza Horizon 4	64 +967%	6−7 −967%
Forza Horizon 5	34	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	59 +5800%	1−2 −5800%
Metro Exodus	40	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	165 +2257%	7−8 −2257%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +575%	4−5 −575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +1060%	5−6 −1060%
Valorant	47	0−1
World of Tanks	130 +900%	12−14 −900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	56 +5500%	1−2 −5500%
Counter-Strike 2	23 +283%	6−7 −283%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +733%	3−4 −733%
Dota 2	89 +8800%	1−2 −8800%
Far Cry 5	73 +943%	7−8 −943%
Forza Horizon 4	55 +817%	6−7 −817%
Forza Horizon 5	39	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +1714%	7−8 −1714%
Valorant	75−80 +7400%	1−2 −7400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +5750%	2−3 −5750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18	0−1
World of Tanks	120−130 +6250%	2−3 −6250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	37	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +400%	3−4 −400%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +1100%	4−5 −1100%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	23	0−1
Metro Exodus	39	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%
Valorant	45−50 +1075%	4−5 −1075%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +107%	14−16 −107%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +107%	14−16 −107%
Metro Exodus	12	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	47 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +107%	14−16 −107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	17	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +200%	2−3 −200%
Dota 2	45 +200%	14−16 −200%
Far Cry 5	24−27	0−1
Fortnite	23	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27−30	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	13	0−1
Valorant	21−24	0−1

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and ATI Mobility HD 5430 compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Mobile is 5800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 5750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 30 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.67	0.33
Recency	15 April 2020	7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	7 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has a 5254.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5430, on the other hand, has 614.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5430 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.