RTX A1000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
16.68

RTX A1000 outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking327199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.8638.44
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242304
Core clock speed1035 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate76.80105.3
Floating-point processing power2.458 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6472
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.68
RTX A1000 28.05
+68.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6427
RTX A1000 10805
+68.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%
1440p34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
4K22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−66.7%
90−95
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−60.4%
170−180
+60.4%
Hitman 3 45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Metro Exodus 86
−62.8%
140−150
+62.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−66.7%
90−95
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
−48.5%
300−310
+48.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−66.7%
90−95
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−60.4%
170−180
+60.4%
Hitman 3 43
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Metro Exodus 66
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 46
−63%
75−80
+63%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 193
−55.4%
300−310
+55.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−60.4%
170−180
+60.4%
Hitman 3 38
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
−66.7%
90−95
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
−50%
24−27
+50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 46
−63%
75−80
+63%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Hitman 3 25
−60%
40−45
+60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130
−61.5%
210−220
+61.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Hitman 3 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−64.7%
140−150
+64.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−50%
30−33
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and RTX A1000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 is 67% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 is 62% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A1000 is 59% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.68 28.05
Recency 2 April 2020 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm

RTX A1000 has a 68.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.