Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	325	390
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N18P-G62 Max-Q	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	768
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	1366 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	76.80	no data
Floating-point performance	2.458 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	84 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projection	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	no data
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.140	+
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.60
+29.4%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.83

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 8564
+33.8%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	53 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
1440p	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
4K	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27
+44.4%

18−20

−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	49 +40%	35−40 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45 +50%	30−33 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +32.5%	80−85 −32.5%
Hitman 3	45 +50%	30−33 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +38.3%	60−65 −38.3%
Metro Exodus	86 +32.3%	65−70 −32.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +40%	45−50 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Watch Dogs: Legion	202 +34.7%	150−160 −34.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +32.5%	80−85 −32.5%
Hitman 3	43 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +38.3%	60−65 −38.3%
Metro Exodus	66 +32%	50−55 −32%
Red Dead Redemption 2	46 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	193 +37.9%	140−150 −37.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +32.5%	80−85 −32.5%
Hitman 3	38 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	57 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

46
+31.4%

35−40

−31.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +36.9%	65−70 −36.9%
Hitman 3	25 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130 +30%	100−105 −30%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+50%

18−20

−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Hitman 3	14 +40%	10−11 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +30.8%	65−70 −30.8%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+50%

10−11

−50%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 33% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 43% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.60	12.83
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a 29.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 136433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.