ATI Rage Mobility-M4 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameTU116M4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 July 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1410 MHz105 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate89.040.21
Floating-point processing power2.849 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs562

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz105 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s840.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DB13W3
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2020 1 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 250 nm

GTX 1650 TU116 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and Rage Mobility-M4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is a desktop card while Rage Mobility-M4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
ATI Rage Mobility-M4
Rage Mobility-M4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-M4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.