Radeon E9260 MXM vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Baffin
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 July 2020 (4 years ago)27 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896896
Core clock speed1410 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate89.0457.60
Floating-point processing power2.849 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs5648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2020 27 September 2016
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 TU116 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

E9260 MXM, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and Radeon E9260 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is a desktop card while Radeon E9260 MXM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
Radeon E9260 MXM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 78 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9260 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.