Radeon Sky 700 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking206not rated
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency18.36no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)27 March 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed1530 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0100.8
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs80112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s176 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2019 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 1650 SUPER has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

Sky 700, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Sky 700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Radeon Sky 700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon Sky 700
Radeon Sky 700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4690 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.