STG-2000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 334 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 36.89 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | no data |
| GPU code name | TU117 | NV1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 30 September 1995 (29 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $249 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 75 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | 1 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 500 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 2 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 0.08 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.304 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 1 |
| TMUs | 64 | 1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | FPM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1751 MHz | 50 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 400.0 MB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA, 1x DB13W3 |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 1.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 30 September 1995 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 500 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 2 Watt |
GTX 1650 Max-Q has an age advantage of 23 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.
STG-2000, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook card while STG-2000 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
