Radeon Instinct MI100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking334not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.09no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)CDNA 1.0 (2020)
GPU code nameTU117Arcturus
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)16 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247680
Core clock speed930 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1502 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million50,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate72.00721.0
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS23.07 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s1,229 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 16 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has 900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Radeon Instinct MI100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
Radeon Instinct MI100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 617 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 53 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.