Quadro M2200 vs GeForce GTX 1080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 with Quadro M2200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080
2016
8 GB GDDR5X, 180 Watt
40.25
+265%

GTX 1080 outperforms M2200 by a whopping 265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking100420
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.47no data
Power efficiency15.4913.90
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104GM206
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2016 (8 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1607 MHz695 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1036 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate277.366.30
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS2.122 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1377 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 40.25
+265%
Quadro M2200 11.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 15533
+264%
Quadro M2200 4262

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 29263
+297%
Quadro M2200 7372

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1080 53598
+118%
Quadro M2200 24622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 21409
+266%
Quadro M2200 5850

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 119971
+217%
Quadro M2200 37796

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 55514
+322%
Quadro M2200 13167

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 421474
+45.7%
Quadro M2200 289176

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 65367
+319%
Quadro M2200 15592

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1080 51531
+302%
Quadro M2200 12812

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1080 141
+200%
Quadro M2200 47

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1080 61
Quadro M2200 86
+42%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1080 8
Quadro M2200 58
+609%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1080 76
+5.8%
Quadro M2200 72

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1080 54
Quadro M2200 69
+25.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1080 34
+39.4%
Quadro M2200 25

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1080 98
+198%
Quadro M2200 33

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1080 9
+65.4%
Quadro M2200 5

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1080 98
+198%
Quadro M2200 33

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1080 140
+199%
Quadro M2200 47

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 1080 76
+5.8%
Quadro M2200 72

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 1080 61
Quadro M2200 86
+42%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 1080 8
Quadro M2200 58
+609%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 1080 54
Quadro M2200 69
+25.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 1080 34
+39.4%
Quadro M2200 25

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GTX 1080 8.6
+65.4%
Quadro M2200 5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD126
+193%
43
−193%
1440p73
+306%
18−21
−306%
4K58
+314%
14
−314%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.75no data
1440p8.21no data
4K10.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+254%
24−27
−254%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Battlefield 5 145
+314%
35−40
−314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 105
+377%
21−24
−377%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%
Far Cry 5 123
+373%
24−27
−373%
Far Cry New Dawn 135
+335%
30−35
−335%
Forza Horizon 4 320
+338%
70−75
−338%
Hitman 3 85−90
+310%
21−24
−310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+183%
55−60
−183%
Metro Exodus 144
+300%
35−40
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+268%
30−35
−268%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
+417%
35−40
−417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+97%
65−70
−97%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 137
+427%
24−27
−427%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Battlefield 5 128
+266%
35−40
−266%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
+332%
21−24
−332%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%
Far Cry 5 98
+277%
24−27
−277%
Far Cry New Dawn 105
+239%
30−35
−239%
Forza Horizon 4 291
+299%
70−75
−299%
Hitman 3 85−90
+310%
21−24
−310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+183%
55−60
−183%
Metro Exodus 131
+264%
35−40
−264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+252%
30−35
−252%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+424%
27−30
−424%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+97%
65−70
−97%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+142%
24−27
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+223%
21−24
−223%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%
Far Cry 5 75
+188%
24−27
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+53.4%
70−75
−53.4%
Hitman 3 85−90
+310%
21−24
−310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+105%
55−60
−105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+311%
35−40
−311%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+305%
20
−305%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+97%
65−70
−97%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 105
+239%
30−35
−239%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+324%
21−24
−324%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
+335%
16−18
−335%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+345%
10−12
−345%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+364%
10−12
−364%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Far Cry 5 53
+308%
12−14
−308%
Forza Horizon 4 282
+453%
50−55
−453%
Hitman 3 50−55
+271%
14−16
−271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+300%
21−24
−300%
Metro Exodus 82
+382%
16−18
−382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+513%
16−18
−513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+436%
10−12
−436%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+183%
65−70
−183%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+350%
18−20
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+330%
10−11
−330%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+388%
8−9
−388%
Hitman 3 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+270%
50−55
−270%
Metro Exodus 47
+422%
9−10
−422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+331%
13
−331%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+450%
6−7
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+480%
5−6
−480%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 27
+350%
6−7
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+364%
14−16
−364%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+588%
8−9
−588%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+320%
10−11
−320%

This is how GTX 1080 and Quadro M2200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 is 193% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 is 306% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 is 314% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1080 is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 surpassed Quadro M2200 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.25 11.04
Recency 27 May 2016 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 1080 has a 264.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 227.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 is a desktop card while Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5230 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 371 vote

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.