GeForce 840M vs GTX 1080

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 with GeForce 840M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080
2016
8 GB GDDR5X, 180 Watt
40.25
+1322%

GTX 1080 outperforms 840M by a whopping 1322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101787
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.47no data
Power efficiency15.495.94
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP104GM108
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 May 2016 (8 years ago)12 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1607 MHz1029 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt33 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate277.317.98
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS0.8632 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s16.02 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.02.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 40.25
+1322%
GeForce 840M 2.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 15533
+1324%
GeForce 840M 1091

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 29263
+1151%
GeForce 840M 2340

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1080 53598
+645%
GeForce 840M 7191

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 21409
+1261%
GeForce 840M 1573

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 119971
+1275%
GeForce 840M 8724

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 55514
+867%
GeForce 840M 5738

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 421474
+252%
GeForce 840M 119888

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1080 65367
+1207%
GeForce 840M 5001

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1080 51531
+827%
GeForce 840M 5561

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 1080 269
+1096%
GeForce 840M 23

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1080 141
+1936%
GeForce 840M 7

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1080 61
+1024%
GeForce 840M 5

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1080 8
+531%
GeForce 840M 1

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1080 76
+756%
GeForce 840M 9

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1080 54
+196%
GeForce 840M 18

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1080 34
+1806%
GeForce 840M 2

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1080 98
+858%
GeForce 840M 10

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1080 9
GeForce 840M 13
+54.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1080 98
+858%
GeForce 840M 10

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1080 140
+1935%
GeForce 840M 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 1080 76
+756%
GeForce 840M 9

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 1080 61
+1024%
GeForce 840M 5

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 1080 8
+531%
GeForce 840M 1

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 1080 54
+196%
GeForce 840M 18

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 1080 34
+1806%
GeForce 840M 2

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GTX 1080 8.6
GeForce 840M 13.3
+54.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p600−650
+1233%
45
−1233%
Full HD126
+641%
17
−641%
1440p73
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
4K58
+1350%
4−5
−1350%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.75no data
1440p8.21no data
4K10.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1320%
5−6
−1320%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+922%
9−10
−922%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Battlefield 5 145
+3525%
4−5
−3525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 105
+1400%
7−8
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Far Cry 5 123
+2360%
5−6
−2360%
Far Cry New Dawn 135
+1588%
8−9
−1588%
Forza Horizon 4 320
+2033%
14−16
−2033%
Hitman 3 85−90
+975%
8−9
−975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+659%
21−24
−659%
Metro Exodus 144
+4700%
3−4
−4700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+1529%
7−8
−1529%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
+1450%
12−14
−1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+242%
35−40
−242%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 137
+1422%
9−10
−1422%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Battlefield 5 128
+3100%
4−5
−3100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Far Cry 5 98
+1860%
5−6
−1860%
Far Cry New Dawn 105
+1213%
8−9
−1213%
Forza Horizon 4 291
+1840%
14−16
−1840%
Hitman 3 85−90
+975%
8−9
−975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+659%
21−24
−659%
Metro Exodus 131
+4267%
3−4
−4267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+1457%
7−8
−1457%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+1133%
12−14
−1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+561%
23
−561%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+242%
35−40
−242%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+600%
9−10
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+914%
7−8
−914%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Far Cry 5 75
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+647%
14−16
−647%
Hitman 3 85−90
+975%
8−9
−975%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+450%
21−24
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+1133%
12−14
−1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+1250%
6
−1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+242%
35−40
−242%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 105
+1400%
7−8
−1400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
+1750%
4−5
−1750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry 5 53
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Forza Horizon 4 282
+1467%
18−20
−1467%
Hitman 3 50−55
+550%
8−9
−550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Metro Exodus 82
+1540%
5−6
−1540%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+1533%
6−7
−1533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+1047%
16−18
−1047%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+1250%
6−7
−1250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Hitman 3 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+1442%
12−14
−1442%
Metro Exodus 47
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+1767%
3−4
−1767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Forza Horizon 4 65 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+950%
4−5
−950%

This is how GTX 1080 and GeForce 840M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 is 1233% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1080 is 641% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 is 1360% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 is 1350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1080 is 6800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 surpassed GeForce 840M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.25 2.83
Recency 27 May 2016 12 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 33 Watt

GTX 1080 has a 1322.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 840M, on the other hand, has 445.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 840M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 is a desktop card while GeForce 840M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GeForce 840M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5230 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 915 votes

Rate GeForce 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.