GeForce 710M vs GTX 1080 Mobile

Place in the ranking	139	1058
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	42.10	no data
Power efficiency	16.24	5.44
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code name	GP104	GK208
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	24 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	192
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	719 MHz
Boost clock speed	1771 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	283.4	11.50
Floating-point processing power	9.068 TFLOPS	0.2761 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	8
TMUs	160	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	DDR3
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	10 GB/s	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 2560x1600
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 2560x1600
HDMI	-	+
HDCP content protection	-	+
G-SYNC support	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	-	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	-	+
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	-	+
Optimus	-	+
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 API
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Mobile 35.56
+2888%

GeForce 710M 1.19

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Mobile 28527
+2478%

GeForce 710M 1107

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1080 Mobile 48874
+953%

GeForce 710M 4641

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Mobile 21394
+2684%

GeForce 710M 769

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Mobile 126690
+2280%

GeForce 710M 5323

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	115 +3733%	3−4 −3733%
1440p	71 +3450%	2−3 −3450%
4K	53 +5200%	1−2 −5200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.35	no data
1440p	7.04	no data
4K	9.43	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+1933%

3−4

−1933%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	59 +1080%	5−6 −1080%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +3800%	2−3 −3800%
Battlefield 5	115 +3733%	3−4 −3733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	93 +2225%	4−5 −2225%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +1933%	3−4 −1933%
Far Cry 5	97 +9600%	1−2 −9600%
Far Cry New Dawn	129 +4200%	3−4 −4200%
Forza Horizon 4	214 +21300%	1−2 −21300%
Hitman 3	91 +1417%	6−7 −1417%
Horizon Zero Dawn	188 +1243%	14−16 −1243%
Metro Exodus	140 +3400%	4−5 −3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	92 +4500%	2−3 −4500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	129 +1513%	8−9 −1513%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150 +369%	30−35 −369%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	106 +2020%	5−6 −2020%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	68 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Battlefield 5	107 +3467%	3−4 −3467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	86 +2050%	4−5 −2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +1933%	3−4 −1933%
Far Cry 5	102 +10100%	1−2 −10100%
Far Cry New Dawn	100 +3233%	3−4 −3233%
Forza Horizon 4	195 +19400%	1−2 −19400%
Hitman 3	87 +1350%	6−7 −1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	186 +1229%	14−16 −1229%
Metro Exodus	126 +3050%	4−5 −3050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	82 +4000%	2−3 −4000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +1500%	8−9 −1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	145 +1218%	10−12 −1218%
Watch Dogs: Legion	149 +366%	30−35 −366%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 +960%	5−6 −960%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +5800%	1−2 −5800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 +1550%	4−5 −1550%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +1933%	3−4 −1933%
Far Cry 5	77 +7600%	1−2 −7600%
Forza Horizon 4	102 +10100%	1−2 −10100%
Hitman 3	76 +1167%	6−7 −1167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	123 +779%	14−16 −779%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +1500%	8−9 −1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +573%	10−12 −573%
Watch Dogs: Legion	51 +59.4%	30−35 −59.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

83
+4050%

2−3

−4050%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +7900%	1−2 −7900%
Far Cry New Dawn	69 +3350%	2−3 −3350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	42 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	46 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	49	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Far Cry 5	47 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
Forza Horizon 4	193 +3117%	6−7 −3117%
Hitman 3	54 +671%	7−8 −671%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 +2125%	4−5 −2125%
Metro Exodus	74 +3600%	2−3 −3600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +4150%	2−3 −4150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	144 +2780%	5−6 −2780%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

72
+1700%

4−5

−1700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40 +3900%	1−2 −3900%
Far Cry New Dawn	39	0−1
Hitman 3	34 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 +4350%	2−3 −4350%
Metro Exodus	45 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +5000%	1−2 −5000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	0−1
Far Cry 5	26	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	61 +2950%	2−3 −2950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +4700%	1−2 −4700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

39
+1850%

2−3

−1850%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and GeForce 710M compete in popular games:

GTX 1080 Mobile is 3733% faster in 1080p
GTX 1080 Mobile is 3450% faster in 1440p
GTX 1080 Mobile is 5200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 21300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 1080 Mobile surpassed GeForce 710M in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.56	1.19
Recency	15 August 2016	24 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 2888.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 710M, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 710M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.