GeForce GT 320M vs GTX 1080 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.37no data
Power efficiency13.89no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP102G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358432
Core clock speed1481 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt14 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.48.000
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs888
TMUs22416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount11 GB512 MB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18568
+17584%
GT 320M 105

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2017 15 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 14 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has an age advantage of 7 years, a 2100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

GT 320M, on the other hand, has 1685.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GT 320M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GT 320M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9533 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 120 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.