GeForce GT 730 vs GTX 1080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q with GeForce GT 730, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5X, 150 Watt
26.49
+1126%

GTX 1080 Max-Q outperforms GT 730 by a whopping 1126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking207863
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Power efficiency12.113.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP104GF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)18 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$59.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256096
Core clock speed1290 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate234.911.2 GT/s
Floating-point processing power7.516 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs16016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.12.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 26.49
+1126%
GT 730 2.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 10207
+1125%
GT 730 833

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 18192
+1455%
GT 730 1170

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+1163%
8−9
−1163%
1440p65
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
4K47
+1467%
3−4
−1467%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.50
1440pno data12.00
4Kno data20.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 78
+1200%
6−7
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Battlefield 5 116
+1189%
9−10
−1189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Far Cry 5 95
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Far Cry New Dawn 118
+1211%
9−10
−1211%
Forza Horizon 4 260
+1138%
21−24
−1138%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1233%
9−10
−1233%
Metro Exodus 133
+1230%
10−11
−1230%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1260%
5−6
−1260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+1136%
14−16
−1136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+1225%
8−9
−1225%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 122
+1256%
9−10
−1256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Battlefield 5 104
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Far Cry 5 77
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Far Cry New Dawn 89
+1171%
7−8
−1171%
Forza Horizon 4 240
+1233%
18−20
−1233%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 203
+1169%
16−18
−1169%
Metro Exodus 110
+1275%
8−9
−1275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1260%
5−6
−1260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 132
+1220%
10−11
−1220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+1225%
8−9
−1225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Far Cry 5 62
+1140%
5−6
−1140%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+1225%
8−9
−1225%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 107
+1238%
8−9
−1238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 112
+1144%
9−10
−1144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+1180%
5−6
−1180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+1500%
3−4
−1500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1260%
5−6
−1260%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Far Cry New Dawn 58
+1350%
4−5
−1350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 42
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 238
+1222%
18−20
−1222%
Hitman 3 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 76
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
Metro Exodus 67
+1240%
5−6
−1240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81
+1250%
6−7
−1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+1370%
10−11
−1370%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Hitman 3 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 93
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
Metro Exodus 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+1400%
3−4
−1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%

This is how GTX 1080 Max-Q and GT 730 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 1163% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 1200% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 1467% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.49 2.16
Recency 27 June 2017 18 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 49 Watt

GTX 1080 Max-Q has a 1126.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GT 730, on the other hand, has 206.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q is a notebook card while GeForce GT 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GeForce GT 730

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6192 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.