GMA 3150 vs GeForce GTX 1070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1481541
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.72no data
Power efficiency16.14no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGP104Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 June 2016 (8 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192016
Core clock speed1506 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt13 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate202.00.8
Floating-point processing power6.463 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs641
TMUs1202

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 13508
+675300%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115no data
1440p67no data
4K50no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.30no data
1440p5.66no data
4K7.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 87 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 no data
Forza Horizon 5 90−95 no data
Metro Exodus 107 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 115 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 156 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Dota 2 74 no data
Far Cry 5 75 no data
Fortnite 150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 no data
Forza Horizon 5 90−95 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 111 no data
Metro Exodus 75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 225 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 43 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data
World of Tanks 270−280 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 no data
Forza Horizon 5 90−95 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 94 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 27 no data
World of Tanks 220−230 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 5 55−60 no data
Metro Exodus 71 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Dota 2 62 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 62 no data
Metro Exodus 23 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37 no data
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Fortnite 44 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2016 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 16 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 1070 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1053.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1070 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8893 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 142 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.