NVS 310 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with NVS 310, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
42.04
+6368%

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile outperforms NVS 310 by a whopping 6368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking941190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiencyno data2.23
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGF119
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)26 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409648
Core clock speed1443 MHz523 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million292 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.184
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1004 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data156 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz875 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+6800%
2−3
−6800%
4K75
+7400%
1−2
−7400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data79.50
4Kno data159.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+7200%
1−2
−7200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6500%
2−3
−6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+10100%
1−2
−10100%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6433%
3−4
−6433%
Hitman 3 85−90
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+8400%
2−3
−8400%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+6400%
2−3
−6400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+7500%
2−3
−7500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+6450%
2−3
−6450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6500%
2−3
−6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+10100%
1−2
−10100%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6433%
3−4
−6433%
Hitman 3 85−90
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+8400%
2−3
−8400%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+6400%
2−3
−6400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+7500%
2−3
−7500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170
+8400%
2−3
−8400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+6450%
2−3
−6450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6433%
3−4
−6433%
Hitman 3 85−90
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+8400%
2−3
−8400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+7500%
2−3
−7500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+9900%
1−2
−9900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+6450%
2−3
−6450%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+7900%
1−2
−7900%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+7533%
3−4
−7533%
Hitman 3 50−55 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+10000%
1−2
−10000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+6500%
3−4
−6500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 0−1
Hitman 3 30−35 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+9250%
2−3
−9250%
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+7100%
1−2
−7100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 0−1

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and NVS 310 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 6800% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 7400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.04 0.65
Recency 16 August 2016 26 June 2012
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 6367.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 310 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while NVS 310 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA NVS 310
NVS 310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 101 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 83 votes

Rate NVS 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.