GeForce GTX 470 vs GTX 1060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	278	515
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	26.44	1.28
Power efficiency	17.15	2.61
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP106	GF100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	26 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$237.11	$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Mobile has 1966% better value for money than GTX 470.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	448
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	607 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,400 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	215 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	105 °C
Texture fill rate	133.6	34.05
Floating-point processing power	4.275 TFLOPS	1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	40
TMUs	80	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1280 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	133.9 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Multi monitor support	+	+
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	2.2	-
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.2
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 Mobile 19.68
+144%

GTX 470 8.05

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1060 Mobile 14693
+238%

GTX 470 4342

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1060 Mobile 34127
+104%

GTX 470 16753

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1060 Mobile 11558
+319%

GTX 470 2758

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1060 Mobile 74605
+190%

GTX 470 25757

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	130−140 +136%	55 −136%
Full HD	67 +4.7%	64 −4.7%
1200p	120−130 +126%	53 −126%
1440p	43 +169%	16−18 −169%
4K	28 +180%	10−12 −180%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.54	5.45
1440p	5.51	21.81
4K	8.47	34.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

37
+185%

12−14

−185%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +210%	20−22 −210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 +382%	10−12 −382%
Battlefield 5	78 +225%	24−27 −225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	61 +281%	16−18 −281%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +131%	12−14 −131%
Far Cry 5	75 +317%	18−20 −317%
Far Cry New Dawn	76 +230%	21−24 −230%
Forza Horizon 4	229 +324%	50−55 −324%
Hitman 3	54 +238%	16−18 −238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	136 +196%	45−50 −196%
Metro Exodus	81 +238%	24−27 −238%
Red Dead Redemption 2	74 +236%	21−24 −236%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	119 +341%	27−30 −341%
Watch Dogs: Legion	137 +140%	55−60 −140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	91 +355%	20−22 −355%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45 +309%	10−12 −309%
Battlefield 5	69 +188%	24−27 −188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55 +244%	16−18 −244%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%
Far Cry 5	59 +228%	18−20 −228%
Far Cry New Dawn	58 +152%	21−24 −152%
Forza Horizon 4	210 +289%	50−55 −289%
Hitman 3	51 +219%	16−18 −219%
Horizon Zero Dawn	134 +191%	45−50 −191%
Metro Exodus	70 +192%	24−27 −192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	62 +182%	21−24 −182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80 +196%	27−30 −196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	122 +430%	21−24 −430%
Watch Dogs: Legion	133 +133%	55−60 −133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +85%	20−22 −85%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +245%	10−12 −245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40 +150%	16−18 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +76.9%	12−14 −76.9%
Far Cry 5	43 +139%	18−20 −139%
Forza Horizon 4	71 +31.5%	50−55 −31.5%
Hitman 3	45 +181%	16−18 −181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 +43.5%	45−50 −43.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	68 +152%	27−30 −152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +69.6%	21−24 −69.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	28 −104%	55−60 +104%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

59
+168%

21−24

−168%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +156%	16−18 −156%
Far Cry New Dawn	40 +233%	12−14 −233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +238%	8−9 −238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 +575%	4−5 −575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27 +238%	8−9 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	28 +211%	9−10 −211%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +458%	30−35 −458%
Hitman 3	24−27 +127%	10−12 −127%
Horizon Zero Dawn	48 +182%	16−18 −182%
Metro Exodus	45 +350%	10−11 −350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +529%	7−8 −529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Watch Dogs: Legion	129 +153%	50−55 −153%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40
+186%

14−16

−186%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +214%	7−8 −214%
Far Cry New Dawn	21 +250%	6−7 −250%
Hitman 3	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	59 +103%	27−30 −103%
Metro Exodus	22 +267%	6−7 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +420%	5−6 −420%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 +260%	5−6 −260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 +233%	3−4 −233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	13 +225%	4−5 −225%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	14 +250%	4−5 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	35 +289%	9−10 −289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20
+150%

8−9

−150%

This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and GTX 470 compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is 136% faster in 900p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 5% faster in 1080p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 126% faster in 1200p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 169% faster in 1440p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 180% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 700% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 470 is 104% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)
GTX 470 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.68	8.05
Recency	15 August 2016	26 March 2010
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1280 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	215 Watt

GTX 1060 Mobile has a 144.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 380% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 168.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 470 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.