Radeon RX Vega Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Vega (2017−2021) |
| GPU code name | GP106 | Vega Mobile |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1265 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,400 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 118.4 | no data |
| Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB and Radeon RX Vega Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| CUDA | 6.1 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 June 2017 | 7 January 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 90 Watt |
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB has 12.5% lower power consumption.
RX Vega Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB and Radeon RX Vega Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
