Quadro RTX 8000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB with Quadro RTX 8000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1060 6 GB
2016
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
26.58

RTX 8000 outperforms GTX 1060 6 GB by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking20460
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.011.87
Power efficiency15.3313.30
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP106TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 July 2016 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 6 GB has 810% better value for money than RTX 8000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804608
Core clock speed1506 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1709 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7509.8
Floating-point processing power4.375 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs80288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length250 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 6 GB 26.58
RTX 8000 49.97
+88%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1060 6 GB 10252
RTX 8000 19278
+88%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
−81.8%
160−170
+81.8%
1440p47
−80.9%
85−90
+80.9%
4K30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.4062.49
1440p6.36117.64
4K9.97181.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−77.8%
80−85
+77.8%
Battlefield 5 89
−79.8%
160−170
+79.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
−81.8%
120−130
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 83
−80.7%
150−160
+80.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
−82.9%
150−160
+82.9%
Forza Horizon 4 279
−79.2%
500−550
+79.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−81.8%
220−230
+81.8%
Metro Exodus 92
−84.8%
170−180
+84.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
−80%
180−190
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135
−85.2%
250−260
+85.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 93
−82.8%
170−180
+82.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−77.8%
80−85
+77.8%
Battlefield 5 78
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60
−83.3%
110−120
+83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 64
−87.5%
120−130
+87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
−87.5%
120−130
+87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 260
−73.1%
450−500
+73.1%
Hitman 3 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−81.8%
220−230
+81.8%
Metro Exodus 78
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 69
−73.9%
120−130
+73.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
−86.8%
170−180
+86.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 183
−63.9%
300−310
+63.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−77.8%
80−85
+77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 43
−86%
80−85
+86%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Far Cry 5 50
−80%
90−95
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 73
−78.1%
130−140
+78.1%
Hitman 3 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−81.8%
220−230
+81.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
−86.8%
170−180
+86.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−81.8%
80−85
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
−73.9%
120−130
+73.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 48
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 43
−86%
80−85
+86%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 31
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Forza Horizon 4 196
−78.6%
350−400
+78.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−81.8%
100−105
+81.8%
Metro Exodus 50
−80%
90−95
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−82.4%
270−280
+82.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 46
−84.8%
85−90
+84.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−85.2%
250−260
+85.2%
Metro Exodus 25
−80%
45−50
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 15
−80%
27−30
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%

This is how GTX 1060 6 GB and RTX 8000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 82% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 8000 is 81% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 8000 is 83% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.58 49.97
Recency 19 July 2016 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 1060 6 GB has 116.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 88% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13365 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 463 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.